Risk factors and outcomes of occurrence of anastomotic leakage and reoperations for its management after colorectal surgery

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is still the most annoying postsurgery complication after colorectal resection due to its serious complications up to death. Limited data were available regarding differences in AL incidence, management, and consequences for different types of colorectal resection. The aim of the present work was to evaluate differences in incidence of AL, incidence of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay in a large number of patients who underwent elective colorectal resection for management of colorectal lesions. In addition to detect when and what type of reoperation for management of AL occur after colorectal resection. Patients: All 250 included patients underwent elective surgeries for colorectal resection with performance of primary anastomosis for management of colorectal neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases in the period between May 2016 and July 31, 2021. We followed the patients for 90 days; we registered the follow-up findings. Results: the rates of AL occurrence were variable after the different procedures. The lowest rate of AL occurrence was found in patients who underwent right hemicolectomy, then in patients who underwent sigmoidectomy, left hemicolectomy, transversectomy and anterior resection (p= 0.004). A stoma was frequently performed during reoperation (79.5%) which was significantly different between different procedures: 65.5% in right hemicolectomy, 75.0% in transversectomy, 85.7% in left hemicolectomy, and 93.0% in sigmoid resection (p< 0.001). Conclusion Rates, types, time of occurrence and severity of AL vary according to the type of colectomy performed and selective construction of stoma during AL reoperation is currently safely applied with comparable mortality rates for patients who did and who did not have a stoma after reoperation. (AU)

Efficacy of laparoscopic colorectal radical resection combined with simultaneous laparoscopic or open major hepatectomy for synchronous colorectal liver metastases / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To explore the clinical effect of laparoscopic colorectal radical resection combined with simultaneous laparoscopic or open major hepatectomy for synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM).Methods The retrospective cohort study was adopted.The clinical data of 14 patients with SCRLM who were admitted to the Peking University Third Hospital from July 2010 to September 2015 were collected.Seven patients undergoing total laparoscopic colorectal radical resection combined with major hepatectomy (TLCRMH) were allocated into the TLCRMH group and 7 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal radical resection combined with open major hepatectomy (LCROMH) were allocated into the LCROMH group.The statuses of colorectal cancer and metastatic lesions were detected by endoscopy and imaging examination,and diagnostic and therapeutic plans were confirmed through the consultation of muhidisciplinary team.During the hepatectomy,total liver ultrasonography was performed and the extent of liver resection was above 3 hepatic segments.The follow-up of outpatient reexamination was applied to all the patients once every 3 months within postoperative year 2 and once every 6 months after 2 years till December 2015.(1) During operation,method of liver resection,radiofrequency ablation (RFA),operation time,volumes of intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion,pathological results of primary lesions (T stage,N stage,nerve invasion and canalis haemalis invasion) were collected.(2) After operation,duration of intensive care unit (ICU) care,time for fluid diet intake,postoperative alanine transaminase (ALT),total bilirubin (TBil),complications and duration of hospital stay were collected.(3) Survival of patients and recurrence of tumor were followed up.Count data were analyzed by the chi-sqaure test.Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as x ± s and analyzed using the t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M(Qn) and M(range) and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.The survival curve was drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method,and overall survival rate and tumor-free survival rate were calculated.The survival analysis was done using the Log-rank test.Results (1) The status of operation:1 and 6 patients in the TLCRMH group underwent respectively left and right hemihepatectomies and 7 patients in the LCROMH group underwent right hemihepatectomy.Four and 6 patients in the TLCRMH and LCROMH groups received local resection of liver metastatic lesions or RFA at segment Ⅱ,Ⅲ or Ⅳ of liver,respectively.The operation time,volumes of intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion were (651 ± 218)minutes,(1 387 ± 871)mL,(914 ±641)mL in the TLCRMH group and (535 ± 83) minutes,(1 357 ±991)mL,(857 ± 360) mL in the LCROMH group,respectively,with no significant difference between the 2 groups (t =1.320,0.060,0.206,P ＞ 0.05).The numbers of patients in T2,T3,T4,N0,N1,N2 stages,with nerve invasion and canalis haemalis invasion were 1,5,1,3,4,0,3,2 in the TLCRMH group and 0,4,3,1,4,2,2,3 in the LCROMH group,respectively,showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (x2=2.111,3.000,0.311,0.311,P ＞ 0.05).(2) After operation,time for fluid diet intake,ALT,TBil,number of patients with complications and duration of hospital stay were (4.3 ± 1.0) days,(105 ± 47) U/L,(34 ± 25) μmol/L,3 (Ⅲ a,Ⅲ b and Ⅳ a grades of Dindo-Clavien grade),(27 ± 21)days in the TLCRMH group and (4.3 ± 1.1)days,(113 ± 57)U/L,(26 ± 11) μmol/L,4 (Ⅰ,Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅳ a grades of Dindo-Clavien grade),(19 ± 9)days,respectively,showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (t =0.079,-0.286,0.806,X2 =0.286,t =0.856,P ＞ 0.05).The duration of ICU care in the TLCRMH and LCROMH groups were (2.1 ± 1.6) days and (1.0 ± 0.6) days,with a significant difference between the 2 groups (t =1.804,P ＜ 0.05).(3) The status of follow-up:all the patients were followed up for 3-54 months,and the median follow-up time was 15 months (range,3-39 months) in the TLCRMH group and 30 months (range,11-54 months) in the LCROMH group.The 1-,3-year overall survival rates were 100.0％ and 100.0％ in the TLCRMH group and 85.7％ and 64.3％ in the LCROMH group,respectively,showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =0.676,P ＞ 0.05).The postoperative 1-,2-year cumulative tumor-free survival rates and overage cumulative tumor-free survival time were 64.3％,64.3％ and 20.5 months in the TLCRMH group and 42.9％,14.3％ and 10.9 months in the LCROMH group,respectively,showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (x2=3.160,P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion TLCRMH is safe and feasible for patients with SCLM,and it is comparable with LCROMH in the incidence of postoperative complication and long-term outcomes.

Reasonable option of digestive tract reconstruction after proctocolectomy / 中华消化外科杂志

Digestive tract reconstruction after proctocolectomy is a critical step of colorectal surgery, proper reconstruction can promote the recovery of digestive tract function and improve the quality of life.At present, there are some candidate reconstruction methods after proctocolectomy, but standardized and proper one is not still established.Since there are differences of the reconstruction methods after proctocolectomy at the different parts of colorectum, the best reconstruction methords should be selected according to the condition and intraoperative situation of patients.

Tratamento laparoscópico de 98 pacientes com endometriose intestinal / Laparoscopic treatment of 98 women with bowel endometriosis

OBJETIVO: Identificar os tipos de tratamento cirúrgico e a morbidade operatória na endometriose intestinal. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de pacientes operadas no Biocor Instituto (Belo Horizonte, MG) por uma equipe multidisciplinar para tratamento de endometriose no período de janeiro de 2002 a junho de 2009. RESULTADO: Noventa e oito pacientes foram submetidas aos seguintes procedimentos para tratamento da endometriose intestinal: ressecção segmentar do reto (n 46; 45,5 por cento), ressecção em disco (n 25; 24,7 por cento), "shaving" (n 18; 17,8 por cento), apendicectomia (n 5; 5 por cento), liberação de aderências sem ressecção (n 5; 5 por cento), ressecção segmentar do sigmóide (n 1; 1 por cento) e ressecção segmentar do colo direito (n 1, 1 por cento). A cirurgia concomitante mais freqüente foi a ressecção de endometriomas ovarianos (n 45). A morbidade operatória foi de 9,2 por cento, sendo as complicações maiores uma fístula retovaginal (1 por cento) e uma deiscência de anastomose (1 por cento). Quarenta e duas pacientes tiveram seguimento médio de 14 meses com recidiva clínica em 8 casos (dor pélvica e dispareunia) e 4 recidivas de imagem à ultrassonografia em parede intestinal, assintomáticas. CONCLUSÃO: O tratamento da endometriose por laparoscopia é factível e seguro, com baixos índices de recidiva.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the types of surgical procedures performed and the operative morbidity in women with bowel endometriosis. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of surgical records of women who underwent surgical treatment of endometriosis by a mutidisciplinar team at Biocor Instituto (Belo Horizonte, MG) from January 2002 to June 2009. RESULTS: Ninety-eight women underwent surgical treatment of bowel endometriosis during the study period. The following surgical procedures were performed: segmetnal rectal resection (n 46; 45,5 percent), intestinal disc excision (n 25; 24,7 percent), "shaving" (n 18; 17,8 percent), appendectomy (n 5; 5 percent), adhesiolysis without intestinal resection (n 5; 5 percent), segmental sigmoidectomy (n 1; 1 percent) e segmental right colon resection (n 1, 1 percent). The most frequent concomitant surgery performed was the removal of ovarian endometriomas (n 45). Operative morbity was observed in 9.2 percent and major complications were rectovaginal fistula (1 percent) and anastomosis dehiscence (1 percent). After a mean followup of 14 months that included 42 patients , recurrence of clinical symptoms (pelvic pain and dyspareunia) was observed in 8 cases as well as 4 cases of asymptomatic intestinal wall endometriosis recurrence which was identified by ultrasonography. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic treatment of bowel endometriosis is feasible, safe and presents a low recurrence rate.

The Effects of a Standardized Postoperative Enhanced Recovery Program after a Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection in Regard to Patients' Recovery and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE: A multidisciplinary program for early recovery after colorectal surgery has been developed continuously since 2000. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the standardized postoperative enhanced recovery program (SPERP) after a colorectal resection. METHODS: The patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal cancer were cared for by using the SPERP after surgery. The comparison group consisted of patients who had undergone similar surgery before establishment of the SPERP. The two groups were compared with respect to the patients' characteristics, operation methods, operation time, blood loss, amounts of intravenous fluid and intravenous antibiotics, complications, postoperative hospital stay, readmission rate, and reoperation rate. RESULTS: The number of patients being treated with the standardized postoperative recovery program, the standardized group (SG), was 63, and that of the traditional group (TG) was 61. Even though the day of oral feeding (1.02 vs. 2.67 days) was faster in the SG, the day of flatus and defecation was not different between two groups. The postoperative hospital stay in the SG (6.76 days) was significantly shorter than that in the TG (10.43 days). The total amount of intravenous fluid after surgery in the SG was 8,574.75 mL, compared with 19,568.22 mL in the TG. The duration of intravenous antibiotics was 2.69 days in the SG and 7.38 days in the TG (P=0.0001). The rates of complication (27.0% in SG vs. 39.3% in TG), reoperation (3.17% vs. 9.84%), and readmission (7.94% vs. 6.56%) did not increase after implementation of this program. CONCLUSION: The standardized postoperative recovery program reduced the amounts of postoperative intravenous fluid and antibiotics and the postoperative hospital stay without increasing either complications or the readmission rate. A prospective multi-center study of this program is needed.

Short-Term Outcome of Curative One-Stage Laparoscopic Resection for Obstructive Left-Sided Colon Cancers Followed by Stent Insertion: Comparative Study with Non-Obstructive Left-Sided Colon Cancers

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery has been considered to be contraindicated for treating malignant colorectal obstruction. Stent insertion for obstructive colorectal cancer has recently allowed laparoscopic surgery to be performed by means of preoperative bowel decompression and bowel preparation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and the feasibility of a one-stage laparoscopic resection for obstructive left-sided colon cancer after stent insertion by comparing the results to those for non-obstructive left-sided colon cancer. METHODS: Between May 2006 and January 2009, a laparoscopic colorectal operation was performed on 18 consecutive patients with obstructive left-sided colon cancer after placement of a self-expandable stent by one colorectal surgeon, and the results were compared retrospectively to those for 43 patients with non-obstructive left-sided colon cancer who had undergone a laparoscopic procedure with the same surgeon. The collected data were the clinicopathologic characteristics, the perioperative complications, the oncologic outcomes, the postoperative recovery results, and the survival rate. RESULTS: The obstructive left-sided colon cancer group had significant benefits in retrieved lymph nodes (18.8+/-5.3 vs. 14.0+/-8.7, P=0.036), and distal resection margin (5.5+/-3.0 cm vs. 3.6+/-2.4 cm, P=0.011). There were no significant differences in other clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes, including the overall 3-yr survival rate, between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative stent decompression followed by a laparoscopic colorectal resection is a safe and feasible option for treating obstructive left-sided colon cancer. A further large-scale prospective study should be performed to evaluate the long-term outcome of a one-stage laparoscopic resection using stent insertion in cases of obstructive left-sided colon cancer.

Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Aged Patients

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the periopertive morbidity and mortality rates in relation to the principal variables in aged patients who undergo laparoscopic colorectal resection. METHODS: From March 2001 to March 2006, the prospective laparoscopic colorectal resection database was used to identify 233 patients. Among them, 132 were 70 years of age or older and they were classified as the aged group. 101 were younger than 70 years of age and they were classified as the younger group. RESULTS: Comorbidity was more common in the aged group than in the younger group (67.4% and 53.5%, respectively) (P=0.030). There were higher ASA scores in the aged group (I: 2.3% II: 68.2% III: 29.5%) than in the younger group (I: 27.7% II: 56.4% III: 15.8%) (P<0.0001). There was a higher postoperative complication rate for the aged group than for the younger group (25.0% and 8.9%, respectively) (P=0.002). Only one case of mortality (0.8%) was found in the aged group. The period of the postoperative hospital stay was longer for the aged group than that for the younger group (21.9+/-3/416.3 days and 16.3+/-3/48.1days, respectively) (P= 0.002). For the aged group, univariate analysis revealed that the operative procedure, disease, the T stage and the operation time were significant variables for the postoperative complications, and multivariate analysis identified the operation time as an independent variable faor the postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: More prudent care is needed to prevent postoperative complications for the aged patients who undergo laparoscopic colorectal resection, and particularly for those who can be expected to have a longer operation time.

Laparoscopic Resection after Stenting in Obstructive Colorectal Cancers

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery has been considered to be contraindicated for treating malignant colorectal obstruction. Stent insertion for obstructive colorectal cancer has recently allowed laparoscopic surgery to be performed by means of preoperative decompression and bowel preparation. This study is designed to evaluate the feasibility of performing laparoscopic surgery followed by stent insertion for treating malignant colorectal obstruction. Further, we wanted to compare the extent of surgery and the outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional colorectal surgery. METHODS: We reviewed nineteen cases of colorectal resections that were treated with stent insertion for malignant obstruction from Feb. 2003 and Aug. 2005. The results of stent insertion, the TNM stage, the extent of surgery and the postoperative courses were compared between the laparoscopic (n=9) and conventional groups (n=10). RESULTS: The stents were successfully inserted and the obstruction was relieved in all the cases. One case of laparoscopic approach was converted to open surgery due to massive tumor invasion to the adjacent organ. In terms of the extent of surgery, there were no significant differences in the tumor size (4.6 vs. 5.0 cm, respectively), the length of the specimen (24.6 vs. 25.3 cm, respectively), the number of retrieved lymph nodes (16.3 vs. 23.1, respectively), the proximal resection margin (12.1 vs. 14.1 cm, respectively), and the distal resection margin (5.4 vs. 5.0 cm, respectively) between the two groups. Also, there were no differences in the first feeding (3.8 vs. 4.4 days) and the postoperative hospital stay (10.0 vs. 11.7 days) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach followed by preoperative stent insertion is a feasible option for treating obstructive colorectal cancer. There were no differences in the extent of surgery and the postoperative outcomes between the laparoscopic and conventional groups. The endoluminal-laparoscopic approach can be an effective strategy for treating obstructive colorectal cancer with its synergic advantage of being minimally invasive.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resection: An analysis of 21 cases / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resection. Methods Clinical data of 21 cases of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resection in this hospital from October 2003 to August 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. Results The hand-assisted laparoscopic resection was accomplished in 20 cases. The mean operation time was 144 min, the mean blood loss was 120 ml, the mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 8.5, and the mean time to intestinal function recovery, 69 h. Postoperative abdominal bleeding was found in 1 case, which was cured with conservative therapy. A conversion to open surgery was needed in 1 case. Conclusions Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resection safe, feasible, and radical, with advantages of fewer complications and simplicity of performance.